Tuesday, March 28, 2017  
Shopping Basket
Home Products My Account Company Census Data Discussion Reviews Support Licensing
P r o d u c t s
Market Segmentation
Geocoding, Site Reports, Zip+4
Census 2010 / ACS
Bundled Packages - Big Savings
Normalized Data
Time Series Research Package
Neighborhood Change Database (1970-2010)
2000 Long Form in 2010 Boundaries
Census 1990 in 2010 Boundaries
Census 1980 in 2010 Boundaries
1990 Long Form in 2000 Boundaries
1980 in 2000 Boundaries
Census 1960,'70,'80,'90,2000
Mailing Lists
Business Data
Crime Reports
Custom Reports
Special Data Sets
Online Data & Maps

CensusCD 1990 Long Form in 2000 Boundaries

FeaturesGeographyVariablesMethodology Order

CensusCD 1990 Long Form in 2000 Boundaries allows users to access US Census data from 1990 and easily compare it with the 2000 Census data. It is the finest source of Census data from 1990 expressed at all of the 2000 geographies. The CensusCD 1990 Long Form in 2000 Boundaries is based upon the long form (STF 3) questions answered by one in six households in the 1990 census. It includes detailed demographic data about topics such as population, household structure, income, poverty, education level, employment, housing costs, immigration, and other variables. The 1990 Long Form in 2000 Boundaries is an invaluable resource for policy makers, community organizations, and researchers who want to analyze the changes that have occurred in the U.S. from 1990 to 2000.

Why Normalize 1990 Data to 2000 Geographic Boundaries? Geographic boundaries change from census to census based on many factors. In the example below Pima County, Arizona is shown broken-out at the census tract level. At a glance, one can observe that there are changes in the census tracts from 1990 to 2000. In fact, Pima County split tracts into multiple parts, with the overall number of tracts growing from 115 to 198 tracts.

Pima County, AZ
Total Census Tracts (115)
Pima County, AZ
Total Census Tracts (198)

Taking a closer look at Pima County from 1990 to 2000 reveals the modifications in tract boundaries that significantly impact how researchers study and account for changes in a population over time. For example, below is a single 1990 Tract # 004800 that was broken into 3 tracts in the 2000 Census. It is a straight forward 1 to 3 correspondence.

1990 Tract ID# 004800
2000 Census Tract Boundaries

However, the changing tract boundaries from 1990 to 2000 are not always that straight forward. In the next example from Pima County, there are two tracts, # 004024 & # 004028, which change into 7 new tracts in 2000. The correspondence in this case is 2 to 7. From these two examples in Pima County, it becomes evident why it is so difficult for researchers to contend with the issue of changing geographic boundaries over time.

1990 Tract ID# 004024 & 004028
2000 Census Tract Boundaries

Normalizing the Data

The actual re-mapping procedure for converting data from 1990 to 2000 boundaries is quite complicated. Here is a link for those wishing a more technical explanation of this task (click here). The basic procedure was to use the Tiger/Line 2000 relationship between 2000 blocks with those from 1990. This allowed us to identify how block boundaries had changed between censuses. For example, if a 1990 block split into two for the 2000 census, others tracts merged, while some tracts both merged and then split. The table below shows the three scenarios (many to one, one to many, and many to many).

There are 8.2 million blocks in the US in 2000, so in fact these are very small geographic areas. But in order to be more precise, when necessary we broke blocks down. When the blocks split then the matter of how to split the population becomes a problem. (When they merge you just add the numbers). In order to determine how to subdivide blocks we looked at the Tiger Street files. The assumption being that people live on or near streets, so the number of addresses on a street will indicate the approximate weight to give to that area of the block.

From the blocks or block parts we created a Block Weighting File. These population weights were then applied to the various other counts to convert them to 2000 block boundaries. Once the data had been calculated at the block level we were then able to sum up the blocks to the various other geographies. Testing was then done to assure the accuracy and validity of the weighting method compared with the original numbers from the 1990 Long Form data set.


GeoLytics, Inc.
PO Box 5336, Somerville, NJ 08876 · 1-800-577-6717 · Voice: 1-908-707-1505 · Fax: 1-908-707-1595
E-mail · Web http://www.geolytics.com · Demographic Resources